Here's Why You Should Own Fewer Stocks

Concentrated Investing is hot off the presses.
The basic idea behind the book is that owning a portfolio of 10 to 15 stocks leads to better results than a widely diversified one.
The book includes profiles of investors who ran such concentrated portfolios. Below are my notes on a few favorites: Lou Simpson, John Maynard Keynes, and Claude Shannon.
Lou Simpson: How an Investor Should Act
Simpson ran GEICO's investment portfolio from 1979 to 2010. His record is extraordinary: 20% annually, compared with 13.5% for the market. His five key strategies are:
•   Think independently
•   Invest in high-return businesses run for the shareholders
•   Pay only a reasonable price, even for an excellent business
•   Invest for the long term
•   Do not diversify excessively
On the last one, Simpson writes: "Companies that meet our criteria are difficult to find. When we think he have found one, we make a large commitment."
Simpson's focus increased over time. In 1982, he had 33 stocks in a $280 million portfolio. He kept cutting back the number of stocks he owned, even as the size of his portfolio grew. By 1995, he had just 10 stocks in a $1.1 billion portfolio.
But he did not just buy and hold. Simpson would add to a holding if it fell (and thus became more attractive). He would trim it back if it got pricey. Simpson didn't sell because the stock price fell. He based his buy and sell decisions on valuation.
Another important aspect of Simpson's record: He did not trade much. There was very little turnover. He said you only need one, two, or three good ideas a year once you're fully vested. "We do a lot of thinking and not a lot of acting. A lot of investors do a lot of acting and not a lot of thinking."
John Maynard Keynes: Successful Through the Great Depression
Keynes is famous as an economist, but early in his career he speculated on currencies and commodities. This risky approach cost him all of his money in the early 1920s. And he nearly lost it all again after the Great Crash of 1929.
After this, he changed his approach. He began to think about stocks as businesses with an underlying value apart from the quoted stock price. He began to hold on to stocks longer. Typically, five years. He often continued to buy them if they fell lower.
He also came to love focusing his portfolio on fewer names:
As time goes on, I get more and more convinced that the right method in investment is to put fairly large sums into enterprises which one thinks one knows something about and in the management of which one thoroughly believes. It is a mistake to think that one limits one's risks by spreading too much between enterprises about which one knows little and has no reason for special confidence…
He made his reputation as a money manager running King's College's endowment. His Chest Fund sometimes had half of its money in just five stocks. In 1933, he had two-thirds of his portfolio in South African mining stocks.
His results were spectacular. The Chest Fund (1927-1945) grew fivefold while the U.K. market fell 15% and the U.S. market fell 21%. He offered up the best summary of his own approach in 1938:
•   A careful selection of a few investments (or a few types of investment) having regard to their cheapness in relation to their probable actual and potential intrinsic value.
•   A steadfast holding of these in fairly large units through thick and thin, perhaps for several years, until either they have fulfilled their promise or it is evident that they were purchased on a mistake.
•   A balanced investment position (i.e. a variety of risks in spite of individual holdings being large).
Claude Shannon: The Power of Rebalancing
Shannon was a brilliant mathematician who made breakthroughs in a number of fields. He might also be the greatest investor you've never heard of.
From the late 1950s to 1986, he earned 28% annually. That's good enough to turn every $1,000 into $1.6 million. What I want to highlight here, though, is an investing method he wrote about later called "Shannon's Demon."
It goes like this: Imagine a portfolio of $10,000 with 50% in cash and 50% in one stock. The idea is that you will always keep this portfolio at 50/50 by rebalancing every day.
So, let's say the stock falls by half after the first day. Now you have $7,500. You have the $5,000 in cash and $2,500 in the stock. You rebalance. Now you have $3,750 in cash and $3,750 in that stock.
The next day, the stock doubles. Now you have $11,250. Your portfolio is up $1,250, even though the stock is at the same level it was when you started. You rebalance again. The stock gets cut in half… If you repeat this pattern, your portfolio will be worth $1.1 million at the end of 80 days.
The assumptions are not realistic, but they make an important point. As the authors of Concentrated Investing point out:
[The gain] occurs though the stock hasn't budged – it's still at its starting price – and a buy-and-hold investor in the stock would have no gain… The rebalancing forces the investor to buy stock at the low, and sell at the high.
Most investors do the opposite. In Bonner Private Portfolio, we use rebalancing strategies to enhance our return. We add to our favorites when the market gives a chance to own them cheaper. We trim them back when the market gives us a good price. And we focus on position size.
Chris Mayer
Editor's note: On Tuesday, June 21, at 8 p.m. Eastern time, Chris, Porter Stansberry, and Agora founder Bill Bonner are hosting their first-ever free training event. In it, you'll learn more about Chris' investment strategy, which beat the returns of several legendary investors over a decade-long period, including Warren Buffett and Carl Icahn. Plus, Bill will explain why he is putting $5 million of his family's trust money into Chris' recommendations. Sign up for this FREE event right here.

Source: DailyWealth

Published by


This is the "wpengine" admin user that our staff uses to gain access to your admin area to provide support and troubleshooting. It can only be accessed by a button in our secure log that auto generates a password and dumps that password after the staff member has logged in. We have taken extreme measures to ensure that our own user is not going to be misused to harm any of our clients sites.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.